Search
Add Listing
  • You have no bookmark.

Your Wishlist : 0 listings

Sign In
U.S.

Final Take: Nebraska had no answer for Illinois’s second half game plan

Final Take: Nebraska had no answer for Illinois’s second half game plan

Give credit to Illinois. They came into Lincoln wanting to make it a four-quarter football game with Nebraska, and that’s precisely what they did.

The Huskers appeared to be in a position to close out the game a couple of times in the second half but couldn’t make the plays they needed. Meanwhile, the Illini’s plan was to keep chopping at the Husker defense, eventually wearing them down.

Subscribe to get exclusive Huskers content on HuskerOnline today – Use promo code GBR for 50 percent off!

The strategy worked, as Illinois held the ball for 18:11 of the second half, converting 5-of-9 third-downs and both of its fourth-down attempts. They outgained the Big Red 221 to 110 in the second half and outscored them 21-7. They rushed for 129 yards on 26 carries in the second half. On 19 first down rushing attempts, Illinois averaged 5.5 yards per carry (104 yards).

The Husker defense had difficulty stopping run plays when Illinois was operating out of spread sets. Head coach Matt Rhule said it was the same thing Colorado tried to do, but CU had no success running the ball.

“We didn’t seem to be the more physical team,” Rhule said after his team’s loss.

This is the Big Ten. It’s a different type of football. Friday night’s game featured five different lead changes. Possessions were precious.

It was also a night when we saw just how special Dylan Raiola’s arm talent can be, but we also saw some of the question marks this team still has.

“It’s our job to score regardless of circumstances,” Raiola said. “They had a fine-oiled machine on offense. Their quarterback played his butt off. Hats off to them. Had a great game plan. There’s really no added pressure. It just comes down to execution. I think our defense played very well. There’s little things that we want to obviously get back and change from this game.”

They have depth issues on the defensive front seven, and the injuries to left tackle Turner Corcoran and Tommi Hill are very concerning. Then you add the injury to kicker Tristan Alvano, who was a late scratch on Friday.

We left Friday night with a lot to consider as the Huskers prepare to take on the remainder of their Big Ten schedule.

“I’m sure our guys will bounce back,” Rhule said. “It was a costly night. We had some big injuries. We’ll have to regroup.”

What I saw on Friday

***Nebraska kicker Tristan Alvano was a late scratch on Saturday, as he did not go through warm-ups, and John Hohl kicked in his place. Hohl connected on his first kick, but missed a critical 39-yard kick.

****NU lost starting left tackle Turner Corcoran to an apparent foot injury. Redshirt freshman Gunnar Gottula stepped at left tackle in his place during the second quarter. Rhule called the injury to Corcoran significant after the game.

***Defensive back Tommi Hill left Friday’s game with a foot injury, and Ceyair Wright took over his place. He was a real bright spot for the Huskers, forcing one of NU’s two turnovers.

***Linebacker John Bullock was outstanding. His early fumble strip set the tone early for the Huskers, but they just weren’t able to finish.

***We saw several big moments with the officials. In two different Isaiah Neyor plays, there was no-call pass interference, and then he had a touchdown ruled off after they determined that the defender had taken the ball from him on the way to the ground. It was the second week we’ve seen this happen to the Huskers. The result was 3 points instead of possibly 14—game changer.

***Nebraska was penalized nine times for 89 yards, including four personal foul penalties for 60 yards. Yuck.

***Hats off again to the event management staff of Nebraska. The atmosphere and the stage were electric as NU celebrated sellout No. 400.

The final grade out

GradeHOL Take
Rushing offenseC-Nebraska’s backs had 24 carries for 89 yards. They needed to have a bigger night in order to have the balance the offense needed at times.
Passing offense A-QB Dylan Raiola was 24-of-35 for 297 yards, three touchdowns and one interception. Illinois didn’t have an answer for him most of the night until things unraveled in overtime. The cross field deep out on third down was a high-level NFL throw.
Rushing defense DNebraska was gashed for 129 yards on 26 carries in the second half by Illinois, which helped them control the tempo of the game.
Passing defense C-Nebraska forced two turnovers on passing defense but still allowed Illinois to complete 21-of-27 passes for 215 yards. NU finished the game with just two sacks.
Special teams DQB Dylan Raiola was 24-of-35 for 297 yards, three touchdowns and one interception. Illinois didn’t have an answer for him most of the night until things unraveled in overtime. The crossfield deep out on third down was a high-level NFL throw.

Sean Callahan can be reached at sean@huskeronline.com and is heard daily at 6:45 am and 5:05 pm on Big Red Radio 1110 KFAB in Omaha during the football season. He can also be seen on KETV Channel 7 in Omaha during the fall, and each week, he appears on Nebraska Public Media’s Big Red Wrap-Up Tuesdays at 7 pm.


Never miss breaking news or another HuskerOnline article again. Click HERE to sign up for HuskerOnline’s Daily and Breaking News Newsletters.

The post Final Take: Nebraska had no answer for Illinois’s second half game plan appeared first on On3.



This article was originally published by Sean Callahan at On3 – (https://www.on3.com/teams/nebraska-cornhuskers/news/final-take-nebraska-had-no-answer-for-illinoiss-second-half-game-plan/).

General Content Disclaimer



The content on this website, including articles generated by artificial intelligence or syndicated from third-party sources, is provided for informational purposes only. We do not own the rights to all images and have not independently verified the accuracy of all information presented. Opinions expressed are those of the original authors and do not necessarily reflect our views. Reader discretion is advised, as some content may contain sensitive, controversial, or unverified information. We are not responsible for user-generated content, technical issues, or the accuracy of external links. Some content may be sponsored or contain affiliate links, which will be identified accordingly. By using this website, you agree to our privacy policy. For concerns, including copyright infringement (DMCA) notices, contact us at info@texasnews.app.

Ohio High School Football Scores: Top 25 updates in Week 5 Prev Post
Ohio High School Football Scores: Top 25 updates in Week 5
Georgia High School Football Scores: Top 25 – Week 5 Next Post
Georgia High School Football Scores: Top 25 – Week 5

Add Comment

Your email is safe with us.

0
Close

Your cart

No products in the cart.